| HOORAY!! / The UN just voted to turn Iraq over to the Iraqis. Is this (a) the beginning of the end of the war and (b) the beginning of a stable, peaceful and prosperous Iraq? It sounds promising to the Editor of this website. |
Security Council, in a 15-0 Vote, Backs Measure on
Iraq Turnover /
By Warren Hoge for the NY Times
UNITED NATIONS -- June 8, 2004— The Security Council voted unanimously
on Tuesday in favor of an American and British resolution to end the formal
of
Iraq on June 30 and transfer "full sovereignty" to an interim Iraqi
government.
Along with giving international legitimacy to the caretaker government
and outlining the United Nations' role in a post-June 30 Iraq, the measure
authorized
an American-led
multinational force, now at 160,000 troops, to use "all necessary measures" in "partnership" with
Iraqi forces to bring peace.
The 15-to-0 vote on the measure, co-sponsored by the United States and Britain,
gave President Bush a major diplomatic win as he gathered with leaders of the
Group of 8 industrialized powers for a summit meeting at Sea Island, Ga.
It provided stark contrast with the bitter division that arose at
the Security Council last year over the American campaign in Iraq. "Today we are united
on Iraq," said Lauro L. Baja Jr. of the Philippines, the Security Council
president. "Yesterday we were divided on Iraq."
It also enabled the United States to cite support for its program to stabilize
Iraq from Council countries like France, Germany and Russia that were vigorously
opposed to American military action there.
John D. Negroponte, the American ambassador to the United Nations
who is to become the United States envoy in Baghdad, said the vote "is
a vivid demonstration of broad, international support for, and I quote from
the text, `a federal,
democratic, pluralist and unified Iraq in which there is full respect for political
and human
rights.' "
Secretary of State Colin L. Powell said the vote showed the international
community was "coming together again to support the Iraqi people."
The Iraqi people, however, are not themselves unified; Kurds in particular
fear the resolution may leave the Shiite majority too much power.
A number of the Security Council countries which had faulted the United States
for disdaining the United Nations before the war praised it on Tuesday for
its willingness to accept suggestions and revisions in the five weeks of negotiations
over the draft.
Gunter Pleuger, the German ambassador, said the United States and
Britain had shown a welcome "flexible and constructive approach."
While the resolution put an international stamp on the American-led military
force in Iraq, American diplomats said they had reined in their earlier hope
that it might attract more nations to contribute troops.
Mr. Bush's national security adviser, Condoleezza Rice, said Monday that the
United States no longer expected to draw in additional troops but that it did
hope that the resolution would persuade countries with military forces already
there not to remove or reduce them.
There were indications, however, that countries with no disposition to join
the multinational force might be drawn to a separate military force to protect
United
Nations personnel that is called for in the resolution.
Fred Eckhard, the spokesman for Secretary General Kofi Annan, said Tuesday
that three or four nations that do not now have troops in Iraq had signaled
their
willingness to join the separate force, which is estimated to number 4,000
soldiers.
In passages that were the most contested during the last two weeks
in which there were four reworkings of the text, the resolution empowered
an American-led
multinational
force to "take all necessary measures to contribute to the maintenance of
security and stability in Iraq," but strictly in "security partnership" with
the Iraqi interim government.
The Iraqi military and police, the measure said, would be under Iraqi
commanders, and American commanders would have to work in "full partnership" and "close
coordination and consultation" with them.
France and Germany had pressed for language giving the Iraqis a veto
over participation in combat operations that they objected to, but in the
end the
two nations
settled for an expanded paragraph that honored the Iraqis' right to take part
in all
security decisions "including policy on sensitive offensive operations." The
reference was to military operations like those in Falluja and Najaf where
Iraqis were unwilling to join allied troops in fighting.
Those words emerged first in letters that were introduced in debate on Sunday
and adopted Tuesday as amendments to the resolution.
The letters, one from Iyad Allawi, the prime minister of the interim
government, and the other from Mr. Powell, described the steps the two governments
meant
to take to solidify the partnership between Iraqi forces and the American command.
Dr. Allawi said he would create and lead a new security ministerial committee
to help coordinate decision-making at "sensitive" moments.
The resolution says the American-led multinational force is in Iraq at the
request and with the consent of the Iraqi interim government, and it gives
the government
the right to order the force's withdrawal. Both Dr. Allawi and Foreign Minister
Hoshyar Zebari, who addressed the Council last week, said they wanted the foreign
troops to stay.
The resolution calls for elections no later than Jan. 31, 2005, to choose a
national assembly to draw up a permanent constitution that would mandate direct
elections
for a full-term government by Dec. 31, 2005.
In another move intended to broaden Iraq's politics, the resolution calls for
a national conference of political, religious and tribal representatives to
select a consultative council to advise the interim government. This idea was
suggested
by the United Nations special envoy to Iraq, Lakhdar Brahimi, who said he imagined
a gathering of as many as 1,000 people, to take place in mid-July.
Kurdish leaders had asked the United States to include in the resolution a
guarantee of Kurdish rights, but American officials rejected the request after
it was strongly
opposed by prominent Shiites. The absence of such a guarantee threatened to
create a serious split between the Kurds and the new Iraqi government.
In its security sections, the resolution said the mandate for the multinational
force would be reviewed a year from now, or sooner if the government to be
elected in January seeks a review.
The resolution also puts the new Iraqi leaders in charge of the nation's oil
and gas revenues.
The United Nations will advise the Iraqis on the development of civil and social
services, the coordination of relief and reconstruction efforts, and the protection
of human rights.
It will help the Iraqis plan a census, set up elections and draft a constitution.
Carina Perelli, head of the United Nations electoral assistance division, has
developed the plans for elections in January 2005, and oversaw the appointment
last week of a new electoral commission.
Copyright 2004 The New York Times Company